linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 3/3] tools/nolibc: stackprotector.h: make __stack_chk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <d5eb12e6b9238dcb85935cf6af3ed12ff043f900.1691073180.git.falcon@tinylab.org>
Date:   Thu,  3 Aug 2023 22:47:01 +0800
From:   Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
To:     thomas@...ch.de, w@....eu
Cc:     falcon@...ylab.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, tanyuan@...ylab.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] tools/nolibc: stackprotector.h: make __stack_chk_init static

This allows to generate smaller text/data/dec size.

As the _start_c() function added by crt.h, __stack_chk_init() is called
from _start_c() instead of the assembly _start. So, it is able to mark
it with static now.

Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
---
 tools/include/nolibc/crt.h            | 2 +-
 tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h | 5 ++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h
index 32e128b0fb62..a5f33fef1672 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 char **environ __attribute__((weak));
 const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak));
 
-void __stack_chk_init(void);
+static void __stack_chk_init(void);
 static void exit(int);
 
 void _start_c(long *sp)
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h b/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
index b620f2b9578d..13f1d0e60387 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h
@@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ void __stack_chk_fail_local(void)
 __attribute__((weak,section(".data.nolibc_stack_chk")))
 uintptr_t __stack_chk_guard;
 
-__attribute__((weak,section(".text.nolibc_stack_chk"))) __no_stack_protector
-void __stack_chk_init(void)
+static __no_stack_protector void __stack_chk_init(void)
 {
 	my_syscall3(__NR_getrandom, &__stack_chk_guard, sizeof(__stack_chk_guard), 0);
 	/* a bit more randomness in case getrandom() fails, ensure the guard is never 0 */
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ void __stack_chk_init(void)
 		__stack_chk_guard ^= (uintptr_t) &__stack_chk_guard;
 }
 #else /* !defined(_NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR) */
-__inline__ void __stack_chk_init(void) {}
+static void __stack_chk_init(void) {}
 #endif /* defined(_NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR) */
 
 #endif /* _NOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
-- 
2.25.1