[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMvnIszqS4ZpkYHj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:42:58 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/6] net/smc: support smc release version
negotiation in clc handshake
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 09:24:17PM +0800, Guangguan Wang wrote:
...
Hi Guangguan Wang,
> @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static int smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(struct smc_sock *smc,
> memcpy(clc_v2->r1.eid, eid, SMC_MAX_EID_LEN);
> len = SMCR_CLC_ACCEPT_CONFIRM_LEN_V2;
> if (first_contact) {
> - smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, &len);
> + smc_clc_fill_fce(&fce, &len, ini->release_ver);
Here ini is dereferenced...
> fce.v2_direct = !link->lgr->uses_gateway;
> memset(&gle, 0, sizeof(gle));
> if (ini && clc->hdr.type == SMC_CLC_CONFIRM) {
... but here it is assumed that ini may be NULL.
This seems inconsistent.
As flagged by Smatch.
...
--
pw-bot: changes-requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists