lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <741645a0-c576-e504-8ebc-6b716099d730@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:57:47 -0700
From:   Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Cc:     Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fix mr->initialized semantics



On 8/3/2023 1:03 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 1:13 AM Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com> wrote:
>> The mr->initialized flag is shared between the control vq and data vq
>> part of the mr init/uninit. But if the control vq and data vq get placed
>> in different ASIDs, it can happen that initializing the control vq will
>> prevent the data vq mr from being initialized.
>>
>> This patch consolidates the control and data vq init parts into their
>> own init functions. The mr->initialized will now be used for the data vq
>> only. The control vq currently doesn't need a flag.
>>
>> The uninitializing part is also taken care of: mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr got
>> split into data and control vq functions which are now also ASID aware.
>>
>> Fixes: 8fcd20c30704 ("vdpa/mlx5: Support different address spaces for control and data")
>> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h |  1 +
>>   drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c        | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>> index 25fc4120b618..a0420be5059f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct mlx5_vdpa_mr {
>>          struct list_head head;
>>          unsigned long num_directs;
>>          unsigned long num_klms;
>> +       /* state of dvq mr */
>>          bool initialized;
>>
>>          /* serialize mkey creation and destruction */
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>> index 03e543229791..4ae14a248a4b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>> @@ -489,60 +489,103 @@ static void destroy_user_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr
>>          }
>>   }
>>
>> -void mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>> +static void _mlx5_vdpa_destroy_cvq_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, unsigned int asid)
>> +{
>> +       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_CVQ_GROUP] != asid)
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       prune_iotlb(mvdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void _mlx5_vdpa_destroy_dvq_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, unsigned int asid)
>>   {
>>          struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>
>> -       mutex_lock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>> +       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_DATAVQ_GROUP] != asid)
>> +               return;
>> +
>>          if (!mr->initialized)
>> -               goto out;
>> +               return;
>>
>> -       prune_iotlb(mvdev);
>>          if (mr->user_mr)
>>                  destroy_user_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>          else
>>                  destroy_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>
>>          mr->initialized = false;
>> -out:
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr_asid(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, unsigned int asid)
>> +{
>> +       struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>> +
>> +       _mlx5_vdpa_destroy_dvq_mr(mvdev, asid);
>> +       _mlx5_vdpa_destroy_cvq_mr(mvdev, asid);
>> +
>>          mutex_unlock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>>   }
>>
>> -static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev,
>> -                               struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb, unsigned int asid)
>> +void mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>> +{
>> +       mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr_asid(mvdev, mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_CVQ_GROUP]);
>> +       mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr_asid(mvdev, mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_DATAVQ_GROUP]);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_cvq_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev,
>> +                                   struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>> +                                   unsigned int asid)
>> +{
>> +       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_CVQ_GROUP] != asid)
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>> +       return dup_iotlb(mvdev, iotlb);
> This worries me as conceptually, there should be no difference between
> dvq mr and cvq mr. The virtqueue should be loosely coupled with mr.
>
> One example is that, if we only do dup_iotlb() but not try to create
> dma mr here, we will break virtio-vdpa:
For this case, I guess we may need another way to support virtio-vdpa 
1:1 mapping rather than overloading virtio device reset semantics, see:

https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg953755.html

 > Conceptually, the address mapping is not a part of the abstraction for
 > a virtio device now. So resetting the memory mapping during virtio
 > device reset seems wrong.

where we want to keep memory mapping intact across virtio device reset 
for best live migration latency/downtime. I wonder would it work to 
reset the mapping in vhost-vdpa life cycle out of virtio reset, say 
introduce a .reset_map() op to restore 1:1 mapping within 
vhost_vdpa_remove_as() right after vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap()? Then we can 
move the iotlb reset logic to there without worry breaking virtio-vdpa.

Thanks,
-Siwei

>
> commit 6f5312f801836e6af9bcbb0bdb44dc423e129206
> Author: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
> Date:   Wed Jun 2 11:58:54 2021 +0300
>
>      vdpa/mlx5: Add support for running with virtio_vdpa
>
>      In order to support running vdpa using vritio_vdpa driver, we need  to
>      create a different kind of MR, one that has 1:1 mapping, since the
>      addresses referring to virtqueues are dma addresses.
>
>      We create the 1:1 MR in mlx5_vdpa_dev_add() only in case firmware
>      supports the general capability umem_uid_0. The reason for that is that
>      1:1 MRs must be created with uid == 0 while virtqueue objects can be
>      created with uid == 0 only when the firmware capability is on.
>
>      If the set_map() callback is called with new translations provided
>      through iotlb, the driver will destroy the 1:1 MR and create a regular
>      one.
>
>      Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
>      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602085854.62690-1-elic@nvidia.com
>      Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>      Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_dvq_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev,
>> +                                   struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
>> +                                   unsigned int asid)
>>   {
>>          struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>          int err;
>>
>> -       if (mr->initialized)
>> +       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_DATAVQ_GROUP] != asid)
>>                  return 0;
>>
>> -       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_DATAVQ_GROUP] == asid) {
>> -               if (iotlb)
>> -                       err = create_user_mr(mvdev, iotlb);
>> -               else
>> -                       err = create_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>> +       if (mr->initialized)
>> +               return 0;
>>
>> -               if (err)
>> -                       return err;
>> -       }
>> +       if (iotlb)
>> +               err = create_user_mr(mvdev, iotlb);
>> +       else
>> +               err = create_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>
>> -       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_CVQ_GROUP] == asid) {
>> -               err = dup_iotlb(mvdev, iotlb);
>> -               if (err)
>> -                       goto out_err;
>> -       }
>> +       if (err)
>> +               return err;
>>
>>          mr->initialized = true;
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev,
>> +                               struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb, unsigned int asid)
>> +{
>> +       int err;
>> +
>> +       err = _mlx5_vdpa_create_dvq_mr(mvdev, iotlb, asid);
>> +       if (err)
>> +               return err;
>> +
>> +       err = _mlx5_vdpa_create_cvq_mr(mvdev, iotlb, asid);
>> +       if (err)
>> +               goto out_err;
>> +
>>          return 0;
>>
>>   out_err:
>> -       if (mvdev->group2asid[MLX5_VDPA_DATAVQ_GROUP] == asid) {
>> -               if (iotlb)
>> -                       destroy_user_mr(mvdev, mr);
>> -               else
>> -                       destroy_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>> -       }
>> +       _mlx5_vdpa_destroy_dvq_mr(mvdev, asid);
>>
>>          return err;
>>   }
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtualization mailing list
> Virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ