[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4be1bfef-9f66-4fa8-bb8b-57e25fbba729@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:22:18 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND*3] ASoC: fsl MPC52xx drivers require
PPC_BESTCOMM
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 11:09:43AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 8/3/23 04:27, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:59:41PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Both SND_MPC52xx_SOC_PCM030 and SND_MPC52xx_SOC_EFIKA select
> >> SND_SOC_MPC5200_AC97. The latter symbol depends on PPC_BESTCOMM,
> >> so the 2 former symbols should also depend on PPC_BESTCOMM since
> >> "select" does not follow any dependency chains.
> > Take a hint, it's not clear that the patch is tasteful.
> Thank you for replying. I'll drop it and just report the build errors.
To be clear I generally don't give you review comments because in the
past I grew so frustrated with having them and their escalations
ignored that it seemed better to just not start. If the patch seems
fine I generally apply it, usually you just don't resend patches so that
works.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists