linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftests: memfd: error out test process when child test fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALmYWFs1DpVYnDTQwaZNuL+PyJEG44-gVwb6PSjdLwgRzgu=Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Aug 2023 19:55:16 -0700
From:   Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@...omium.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftests: memfd: error out test process when
 child test fails

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 7:25 PM Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-07-19, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 7:34 AM Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Before this change, a test runner using this self test would see a
> > > return code of 0 when the tests using a child process (namely the
> > > MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL and MFD_EXEC tests) failed, masking test failures.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 11f75a01448f ("selftests/memfd: add tests for MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL MFD_EXEC")
> > > Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
> > > index d8342989c547..8b7390ad81d1 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
> > > @@ -1219,7 +1219,24 @@ static pid_t spawn_newpid_thread(unsigned int flags, int (*fn)(void *))
> > >
> > >  static void join_newpid_thread(pid_t pid)
> > >  {
> > > -       waitpid(pid, NULL, 0);
> > > +       int wstatus;
> > > +
> > > +       if (waitpid(pid, &wstatus, 0) < 0) {
> > > +               printf("newpid thread: waitpid() failed: %m\n");
> > > +               abort();
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       if (WIFEXITED(wstatus) && WEXITSTATUS(wstatus) != 0) {
> > > +               printf("newpid thread: exited with non-zero error code %d\n",
> > > +                      WEXITSTATUS(wstatus));
> > > +               abort();
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       if (WIFSIGNALED(wstatus)) {
> > > +               printf("newpid thread: killed by signal %d\n",
> > > +                      WTERMSIG(wstatus));
> > > +               abort();
> > > +       }
> > >  }
> > >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>
>
> Did you mean for this to a Reviewed-by?
>
Yes! Thanks for asking.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...gle.com>


> --
> Aleksa Sarai
> Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
> SUSE Linux GmbH
> <https://www.cyphar.com/>