[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BD9DB9F2-B277-4CAC-8FA5-9B8F970A2F88@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 12:52:50 +0530
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tests task_analyzer: Check perf build options
for libtraceevent support
> On 03-Aug-2023, at 8:33 AM, Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaldo,
> I am working on a patch for 'perf version --has', and will send a patch next
Hi Aditya,
I believe, it will be “perf build —has” option. And not “perf version —has” ?
Thanks
Athira
> week using that instead of 'perf version --build-options'.
>
> You can skip this patch if not needed.
>
> Thanks,
> - Aditya G
Powered by blists - more mailing lists