linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: lockd: avoid possible wrong NULL parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <057a4eea-d55a-4402-81c1-46b04b405a73@kadam.mountain>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 12:10:46 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To:     Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
        jlayton@...nel.org, neilb@...e.de, kolga@...app.com,
        Dai.Ngo@...cle.com, tom@...pey.com,
        trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna@...nel.org,
        nathan@...nel.org, trix@...hat.com, bfields@...ldses.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: lockd: avoid possible wrong NULL parameter

On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:16:40PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> Should I send a separate patch for this bug and add you as Reported-by ?

I feel like neither of us know if we should add a check to the
intializer or remove the check from dprintk.  If you know the answer,
than absolutely, please send a patch.

regards,
dan carpenter