[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230803014814epcms2p3ed3f8a7e5f53e98d0acf478617445aee@epcms2p3>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 10:48:14 +0900
From: Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@...sung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"chaitanya.kulkarni@....com" <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: RE:(2) [PATCH v2 3/4] bio-integrity: cleanup adding integrity pages
to bip's bvec
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 09:54:59PM +0900, Jinyoung Choi wrote:
> > The bio_integrity_add_page() returns the set length if the execution
> > result is successful. Otherwise, return 0.
> >
> > Unnecessary if statement was removed. And when the result value was less
> > than the set value, it was changed to failed.
>
> Maybe word this as
>
> bio_integrity_add_page() returns the add length if successful, else 0,
> just as bio_add_page. Simply check return value checking in
> bio_integrity_prep to not deal with a > 0 but < len case that can't
> happen.
>
> Otherwise looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Hi, Christoph.
Thank you for your review. I will update comment soon!
Best Regards,
Jinyoung.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists