[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMuSFYQ4YyIKnI0k@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:40:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: make
interrupt optional
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 11:53:59PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 12:57:44AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 04:43:48PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 11:05:44PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > The driver fall back to poll style when there's no irq. "poll" still
> > > > looks better than no support.
> > >
> > > What is the user for this where the interrupt is not actually wired up
> > > in the hardware?
> >
> > FYI: kernel console doesn't use interrupts, so for example it might be
> > the debug port. Note, I have no idea of the Zhang's case, just my assumption.
>
> I'm less interested in what the software is doing, it's what the device
> that has not connected the interrupt is that I am curious about.
As I said. The hw may be purely for debugging purposes (and yes, I have heard
about such a hardware).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists