| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAD8CoPC5YwEcyqH5nBziGTi5oHuGf1ucQF63UApSPtfGW-vjSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 20:37:04 +0800
From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 2/5] perf sched: reorganize sched-out task state
report code
Hi Steven,
THIS IS THE NEW CHANGELOG FOR THIS PATCH:
perf sched: reorganize sched-out task state report code
Passing around the task state reported by tracepoint as an
integer creates dependencies both on the task state macros
and TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR.
Actually we can simplify this by computing the state based
on TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR and then pass the result as a
'char', which saves us from using these macros anymore.
So we can remove them for good.
Note that sched_out_state() is basically doing the same
thing as task_state_char(), so combine them into one
and provide an intended helper get_task_prev_state() for
extracting task state from perf record.
IOW, this patch does not introduce any functional changes.
mainly for housekeeping.
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Suggestions?
Regards,
Ze
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 5:10 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 04:33:49 -0400
> Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Mainly does housekeeping work and not introduce any
> > functional change.
>
> This change log doesn't explain at all why this patch is needed, let alone
> what it is even doing.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> > index 8dc8f071721c..5042874ba204 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> > @@ -94,11 +94,6 @@ struct sched_atom {
> >
> > #define TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR "RSDTtXZPI"
> >
> > -/* task state bitmask, copied from include/linux/sched.h */
> > -#define TASK_RUNNING 0
> > -#define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 1
> > -#define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE 2
> > -
> > enum thread_state {
> > THREAD_SLEEPING = 0,
> > THREAD_WAIT_CPU,
> > @@ -255,7 +250,7 @@ struct thread_runtime {
> > u64 total_preempt_time;
> > u64 total_delay_time;
> >
> > - int last_state;
> > + char last_state;
> >
> > char shortname[3];
> > bool comm_changed;
> > @@ -425,7 +420,7 @@ static void add_sched_event_wakeup(struct perf_sched *sched, struct task_desc *t
> > }
> >
> > static void add_sched_event_sleep(struct perf_sched *sched, struct task_desc *task,
> > - u64 timestamp, u64 task_state __maybe_unused)
> > + u64 timestamp, char task_state __maybe_unused)
> > {
> > struct sched_atom *event = get_new_event(task, timestamp);
> >
> > @@ -840,6 +835,22 @@ replay_wakeup_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline char task_state_char(int state)
> > +{
> > + static const char state_to_char[] = "RSDTtXZPI";
> > + unsigned int bit = state ? ffs(state) : 0;
> > +
> > + return bit < sizeof(state_to_char) - 1 ? state_to_char[bit] : '?';
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline char get_task_prev_state(struct evsel *evsel,
> > + struct perf_sample *sample)
> > +{
> > + const int prev_state = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_state");
> > +
> > + return task_state_char(prev_state);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int replay_switch_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > struct evsel *evsel,
> > struct perf_sample *sample,
> > @@ -849,7 +860,7 @@ static int replay_switch_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > *next_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "next_comm");
> > const u32 prev_pid = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_pid"),
> > next_pid = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "next_pid");
> > - const u64 prev_state = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_state");
> > + const char prev_state = get_task_prev_state(evsel, sample);
> > struct task_desc *prev, __maybe_unused *next;
> > u64 timestamp0, timestamp = sample->time;
> > int cpu = sample->cpu;
> > @@ -1039,12 +1050,6 @@ static int thread_atoms_insert(struct perf_sched *sched, struct thread *thread)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static char sched_out_state(u64 prev_state)
> > -{
> > - const char *str = TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR;
> > -
> > - return str[prev_state];
> > -}
> >
> > static int
> > add_sched_out_event(struct work_atoms *atoms,
> > @@ -1121,7 +1126,7 @@ static int latency_switch_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > {
> > const u32 prev_pid = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_pid"),
> > next_pid = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "next_pid");
> > - const u64 prev_state = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_state");
> > + const char prev_state = get_task_prev_state(evsel, sample);
> > struct work_atoms *out_events, *in_events;
> > struct thread *sched_out, *sched_in;
> > u64 timestamp0, timestamp = sample->time;
> > @@ -1157,7 +1162,7 @@ static int latency_switch_event(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > goto out_put;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (add_sched_out_event(out_events, sched_out_state(prev_state), timestamp))
> > + if (add_sched_out_event(out_events, prev_state, timestamp))
> > return -1;
> >
> > in_events = thread_atoms_search(&sched->atom_root, sched_in, &sched->cmp_pid);
> > @@ -2022,24 +2027,12 @@ static void timehist_header(struct perf_sched *sched)
> > printf("\n");
> > }
> >
> > -static char task_state_char(struct thread *thread, int state)
> > -{
> > - static const char state_to_char[] = TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR;
> > - unsigned bit = state ? ffs(state) : 0;
> > -
> > - /* 'I' for idle */
> > - if (thread__tid(thread) == 0)
> > - return 'I';
> > -
> > - return bit < sizeof(state_to_char) - 1 ? state_to_char[bit] : '?';
> > -}
> > -
> > static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > struct evsel *evsel,
> > struct perf_sample *sample,
> > struct addr_location *al,
> > struct thread *thread,
> > - u64 t, int state)
> > + u64 t, char state)
> > {
> > struct thread_runtime *tr = thread__priv(thread);
> > const char *next_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "next_comm");
> > @@ -2080,7 +2073,7 @@ static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched *sched,
> > print_sched_time(tr->dt_run, 6);
> >
> > if (sched->show_state)
> > - printf(" %5c ", task_state_char(thread, state));
> > + printf(" %5c ", thread->tid == 0 ? 'I' : state);
> >
> > if (sched->show_next) {
> > snprintf(nstr, sizeof(nstr), "next: %s[%d]", next_comm, next_pid);
> > @@ -2152,9 +2145,9 @@ static void timehist_update_runtime_stats(struct thread_runtime *r,
> > else if (r->last_time) {
> > u64 dt_wait = tprev - r->last_time;
> >
> > - if (r->last_state == TASK_RUNNING)
> > + if (r->last_state == 'R')
> > r->dt_preempt = dt_wait;
> > - else if (r->last_state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
> > + else if (r->last_state == 'D')
> > r->dt_iowait = dt_wait;
> > else
> > r->dt_sleep = dt_wait;
> > @@ -2579,7 +2572,7 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> > struct thread_runtime *tr = NULL;
> > u64 tprev, t = sample->time;
> > int rc = 0;
> > - int state = evsel__intval(evsel, sample, "prev_state");
> > + const char state = get_task_prev_state(evsel, sample);
> >
> > addr_location__init(&al);
> > if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists