linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] sched, tracing: reorganize fields of switch event struct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD8CoPBjp1gkLx5-LcO2j2hA8tXCbBs7Nh453hauxu3d3gwrGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 3 Aug 2023 20:57:35 +0800
From:   Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] sched, tracing: reorganize fields of switch
 event struct

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 5:18 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu,  3 Aug 2023 04:33:50 -0400
> Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Report prioritiy and prev_state in 'short' to save some buffer
> > space. And also reorder the fields so that we take struct
> > alignment into consideration to make the record compact.
>
> If I were to write this, I would have wrote:
>
>   The prev_state field in the sched_switch event is assigned by
>   __trace_sched_switch_state(). The largest number that function will return
>   is TASK_REPORT_MAX which is just 0x100. There's no reason that the
>   prev_state field is a full 32 bits when it is using just 9 bits max. In
>   order to save space on the ring buffer, shrink the prev_state to 16 bits
>   (short).
>
>   Also, change the positions of the other fields to accommodate the short
>   value of prev_state to eliminate any holes that were created in the
>   structure.

Thanks for this elaboration! But I see Peter have comments on this, I'll wait
to see these resolved and then send my new changelog.

Thanks,
Ze

> >
> >  #ifdef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > -static inline long __trace_sched_switch_state(bool preempt,
> > +static inline short __trace_sched_switch_state(bool preempt,
> >                                             unsigned int prev_state,
> >                                             struct task_struct *p)
> >  {
> >       unsigned int state;
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> > -     BUG_ON(p != current);
> > +     WARN_ON_ONCE(p != current);
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
>
> The above needs to be a separate patch.
>
> -- Steve
>
> >
> >       /*
> > @@ -229,23 +229,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
> >       TP_ARGS(preempt, prev, next, prev_state),
> >
> >       TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > -             __array(        char,   prev_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
> >               __field(        pid_t,  prev_pid                        )
> > -             __field(        int,    prev_prio                       )
> > -             __field(        long,   prev_state                      )
> > -             __array(        char,   next_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
> >               __field(        pid_t,  next_pid                        )
> > -             __field(        int,    next_prio                       )
> > +             __field(        short,  prev_prio                       )
> > +             __field(        short,  next_prio                       )
> > +             __array(        char,   prev_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
> > +             __array(        char,   next_comm,      TASK_COMM_LEN   )
> > +             __field(        short,  prev_state                      )
> >       ),
> >
> >       TP_fast_assign(
> > -             memcpy(__entry->next_comm, next->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > -             __entry->prev_pid       = prev->pid;
> > -             __entry->prev_prio      = prev->prio;
> > -             __entry->prev_state     = __trace_sched_switch_state(preempt, prev_state, prev);
> > +             __entry->prev_pid               = prev->pid;
> > +             __entry->next_pid               = next->pid;
> > +             __entry->prev_prio              = (short) prev->prio;
> > +             __entry->next_prio              = (short) next->prio;
> >               memcpy(__entry->prev_comm, prev->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > -             __entry->next_pid       = next->pid;
> > -             __entry->next_prio      = next->prio;
> > +             memcpy(__entry->next_comm, next->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> > +             __entry->prev_state             = __trace_sched_switch_state(preempt, prev_state, prev);
> >               /* XXX SCHED_DEADLINE */
> >       ),
> >
>