[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230804160542.GA19120@wunner.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:05:42 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Alistair Francis <alistair23@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
christian.koenig@....com, kch@...dia.com, logang@...tatee.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE protocols via sysfs
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:17:59AM -0400, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:52???PM Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> > I kind of like the approach of exposing a list which can be grep'ed,
> > even though it may go against the rule of having just one datum per
> > attribute. I'd prefer a representation that's human-readable though,
> > e.g. "0001:01" for CMA-SPDM.
>
> Yeah, it's my preferred method as well, but it's not going to be
> accepted upstream
How about procfs instead of sysfs?
No "single datum per file" rule over there.
PCI content goes into /proc/bus/pci/.
Already used by lspci to access config space.
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists