lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 09:10:37 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
        Naresh Solanki <naresh.solanki@...ements.com>
Cc:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add MAX6639

On 8/4/23 08:48, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 04:43:59PM +0200, Naresh Solanki wrote:
>> From: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
>>
>> Add binding documentation for Maxim MAX6639 fan-speed controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V3:
>> - Update title
>> - Add pulses-per-revolution, supplies & interrupts
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Update subject
>> - Drop blank lines
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml         | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..b3292061ca58
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/maxim,max6639.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Maxim MAX6639 Fan Controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@...ements.com>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> +  The MAX6639 is a 2-channel temperature monitor with dual, automatic, PWM
>> +  fan-speed controller.  It monitors its own temperature and one external
>> +  diode-connected transistor or the temperatures of two external diode-connected
>> +  transistors, typically available in CPUs, FPGAs, or GPUs.
> 
>> +  fan-supply:
>> +    description: Phandle to the regulator that provides power to the fan.
> 
>> +  pulses-per-revolution:
>> +    description:
>> +      Define the number of pulses per fan revolution for each tachometer
>> +      input as an integer.
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> +    enum: [1, 2, 3, 4]
>> +    default: 2
> 
> Apologies if I am digging up old wounds here, since there was quite a
> bit of back and forth on the last version, but these two newly added
> properties look to be common with the "pwm-fan" and with
> "adi,axi-fan-control". At what point should these live in a common
> schema instead?
> 
> Otherwise, this looks okay to me, although I'll leave things to
> Krzysztof since he had a lot to say about the previous version.
> 

Rob has said that he won't accept any fan controller bindings without a generic
schema. At the same time he has said that he expects properties such as the
number of pulses per revolution to be attached to a 'fan' description, and he
wants pwm related properties of fan controllers to be modeled as pwm controllers.
And now we have a notion of a regulator providing power to the fan (which again
would be the fan controller, at least in cases where the fan controller
provides direct voltage to the fan). On top of that, this fan-supply property
should presumably, again, be part of a fan description and not be part of the
controller description. I don't think anyone knows how to make this all work
(I for sure don't), so it is very unlikely we'll see a generic fan controller
schema anytime soon.

Given that neither fan-supply nor pulses-per-revolution is implemented in the
driver, and given that I am not aware of any fans which would have a value for
pulses-per-revolution other than 2, my personal suggestion would be to add the
chip to trivial devices and be done with it for the time being.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ