[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyTPExgjcaUeKiR108geQhr0KwFC0A8qa_n_ST2RxhbSczomQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 12:54:40 -0400
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Broken or delayed ethernet on Xilinx ZCU104 since 5.18 (regression)
On 2023-08-04, Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca> wrote:
> On 04/08/2023, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 9:27 AM Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca> wrote:
>>> commit e461bd6f43f4e568f7436a8b6bc21c4ce6914c36
>>> Author: Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>
>>> Date: Thu Jan 27 10:37:36 2022 -0600
>>>
>>> arm64: dts: zynqmp: Added GEM reset definitions
>>>
>>> Reverting this fixes the problem on 5.18. Reverting this fixes the
>>> problem on 6.1. Reverting this fixes the problem on 6.4. In all of
>>> these versions, with this change reverted, the network device appears
>>> without delay.
>>
>> With the above change, the kernel is going to be waiting for the reset
>> driver which either didn't exist or wasn't enabled in your config
>> (maybe kconfig needs to be tweaked to enable it automatically).
>
> The dts defines a reset-controller node with
>
> compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-reset"
>
> As far as I can see, this is supposed to be handled by the code in
> drivers/reset/zynqmp-reset.c driver, it is enabled by CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP,
> and I have that set to "y", and it appears to be getting compiled in (that
> is, there is a drivers/reset/zynqmp-reset.o file in the build directory).
Oh, I get it, to include this driver I need to also enable:
CONFIG_RESET_CONTROLLER=y
Setting this fixes 6.4. Perhaps CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQMP should select it?
I guess the reset-zynqmp.o file that was in my build directory must
have been leftover garbage from a long time ago.
However, even with this option enabled, 6.5-rc4 remains broken (no
change in behaviour wrt. the network device). I will bisect this
now.
Cheers,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists