linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/traps: Get rid of exception handlers' second argument error code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB67349385C20E8D3B0C960432A809A@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 17:35:11 +0000
From:   "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Gross, Jurgen" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "Ostrovsky, Boris" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/traps: Get rid of exception handlers' second
 argument error code

> > The IDT event delivery of X86_TRAP_DF, X86_TRAP_TS, X86_TRAP_NP,
> > X86_TRAP_SS, X86_TRAP_GP, X86_TRAP_AC and X86_TRAP_CP pushes an error
> > code into the orig_ax member of the pt_regs structure, and the error
> > code is passed as the second argument of their C-handlers, although
> > the pt_regs structure is already passed as the first argument.
> >
> > The asm entry code of such faults does the following
> >
> >   movq ORIG_RAX(%rsp), %rsi	/* get error code into 2nd argument*/
> >   movq $-1, ORIG_RAX(%rsp)	/* no syscall to restart */
> >
> > to set the orig_ax member to -1 just before calling the C-handler.
> >
> > In addition, the IRQ entry code uses the second error code argument as
> > its IRQ vector, as the IRQ asm entry code pushes its IRQ vector into
> > the orig_ax member.
> >
> > The commit d99015b1abbad ("x86: move entry_64.S register saving out of
> > the macros") introduced the changes to set orig_ax to -1, but I can't
> > see why it's required. Our tests on x86_64 and x86_32 seem fine if
> > orig_ax is left unchanged instead of set to -1.
> 
> That means that SYSCALL_NUM(regs) get to be garbage; or something like that.

I find SYSCALL_NUM(regs) in tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c,
but nothing obvious to me.

I think it's clear that once exceptions and IRQs are handled, the original
context will be fully recovered in a normal case.

Is it related to preemption after such a event?

I must have missed something; can you please elaborate it?