[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230804210055.i4hnjsr4ltfak53e@intel.intel>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:00:55 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] i2c: designware: Always provide ID tables
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:05:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 03:33:59PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 7/25/23 17:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > +/* Work with hotplug and coldplug */
> > > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:i2c_designware");
> >
> > Perhaps this comment can be retired, i.e. dropped.
>
> Then it needs to be done in a separate patch, because in the other file the
> comment will be left untouched.
You are being a bit too religios here... if you want to stick to
this, then you need to send a patch for sorting by ID, a patch
for grouping together MODULE_*, a patch to remove this comment
and a patch to always provide the id table.
I think, "while at it", you can safely remove the redundant
comment :)
It doesn't make too much difference to me anyway:
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists