[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <172bce60-6581-4832-b489-7497989fc91e@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 23:17:12 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] media: venus: core: Add SC8280XP resource struct
On 4.08.2023 23:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 04/08/2023 22:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> Would it not be more legitimate and logical to have 8350 use 8280xp's frequency table, instead of 8250 ?
>> top freq is higher on 8280
>
> Still though its a bit suspicious 8350 doesn't have its own table.
>
> Are we missing the downstream reference ?
8250:
qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
8350:
qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
(identical)
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists