[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GawbwA4OVf33vGv3wt-RSQwBEb7E3Jsm=6H5owq2Hyxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 11:51:13 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: Use bitfield values for range selectors
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:50 PM Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/14/23 11:14, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Right now the regulator helpers expect raw register values for the range
> > selectors. This is different from the voltage selectors, which are
> > normalized as bitfield values. This leads to a bit of confusion. Also,
> > raw values are harder to copy from datasheets or match up with them,
> > as datasheets will typically have bitfield values.
> >
> > Make the helpers expect bitfield values, and convert existing users. The
> > field in regulator_desc is renamed to |linear_range_selectors_bitfield|.
> > This is intended to cause drivers added in the same merge window and
> > out-of-tree drivers using the incorrect variable and values to break,
> > preventing incorrect values being used on actual hardware and potentially
> > producing magic smoke.
> >
> > Also include bitops.h explicitly for ffs(), and reorder the header include
> > statements. While at it, also replace module.h with export.h, since the
> > only use is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Changed .linear_range_selectors to .linear_range_selectors_bitfield,
> > as suggested by David
> > - Dropped Matti's Reviewed-by due to this intrusive change
>
> Sorry for late reply, I assume this is already merged... I was mostly
> offline for a month or so - I can recommend, works wonders ;)
I'm sure it does, but I dread the part of coming back afterwards and
having to catch up with a month's worth of mail and development :S
> Just wanted to say (and in case this is not yet merged) - still looks
> good to me (helpers and bd718x7 parts).
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists