[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZMyZ5kZSiiJHtdeS@titan>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:25:42 +1000
From: John Watts <contact@...kia.org>
To: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>,
Maksim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mkl@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: allwinner: d1: Specify default CAN pins
On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 10:59:30PM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> pinctrl-names and pinctrl-0 are usually at the top. However, since there is no
> hard rule (I've seen it mixed), I'm fine with it.
Happy to change if needed.
> Since original DT node entry goes through netdev tree, this should be picked
> there or it can be dropped there and I pick both patches or I can pick patch
> for later kernel version.
Do I have to do something based on this, like resend my patch?
> Best regards,
> Jernej
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists