[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:18:13 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, chunkuang.hu@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, ehristev@...labora.com,
wenst@...omium.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 07/16] drm/mediatek: aal: Use bitfield macros
Hi AngeloGioacchino,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
[also build test ERROR on pza/reset/next]
[cannot apply to pza/imx-drm/next mbgg-mediatek/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/AngeloGioacchino-Del-Regno/drm-mediatek-gamma-Adjust-mtk_drm_gamma_set_common-parameters/20230803-190918
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803110214.163645-8-angelogioacchino.delregno%40collabora.com
patch subject: [PATCH v9 07/16] drm/mediatek: aal: Use bitfield macros
config: arm-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230804/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230804/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308041431.xXkaXQ8u-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c: In function 'mtk_aal_config':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_PREP' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
63 | sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:25: error: 'DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DISP_AAL_SIZE_HSIZE'?
63 | sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| DISP_AAL_SIZE_HSIZE
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:63:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:64:26: error: 'DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DISP_AAL_SIZE_VSIZE'?
64 | sz |= FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE, h);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| DISP_AAL_SIZE_VSIZE
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/FIELD_PREP +63 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c
55
56 void mtk_aal_config(struct device *dev, unsigned int w,
57 unsigned int h, unsigned int vrefresh,
58 unsigned int bpc, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
59 {
60 struct mtk_disp_aal *aal = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
61 u32 sz;
62
> 63 sz = FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_HSIZE, w);
64 sz |= FIELD_PREP(DISP_GAMMA_SIZE_VSIZE, h);
65
66 mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, sz, &aal->cmdq_reg, aal->regs, DISP_AAL_SIZE);
67 mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, sz, &aal->cmdq_reg, aal->regs, DISP_AAL_OUTPUT_SIZE);
68 }
69
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists