[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3676cc3a-91f1-ec50-5d89-2a3901d0fda7@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:48:12 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] coresight: trbe: Add a representative
coresight_platform_data for TRBE
On 8/3/23 19:25, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 03/08/2023 06:56, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> TRBE coresight devices do not need regular connections information, as the
>> paths get built between all percpu source and their respective percpu sink
>> devices. Please refer 'commit 2cd87a7b293d ("coresight: core: Add support
>> for dedicated percpu sinks")' which added support for percpu sink devices.
>>
>> coresight_register() expect device connections via the platform_data. TRBE
>> devices do not have any graph connections and thus is empty. With upcoming
>> ACPI support for TRBE, we do not get a real acpi_device and thus
>> coresight_get_platform_dat() will end up in failures. Hence this allocates
>> a zeroed coresight_platform_data structure and assigns that back into the
>> device.
>>
>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> index 7720619909d6..e1d9d06e7725 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>> @@ -1494,9 +1494,9 @@ static int arm_trbe_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (!drvdata)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - pdata = coresight_get_platform_data(dev);
>> - if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>> - return PTR_ERR(pdata);
>> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pdata)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> Please could you add a comment in here, on why we use a dummy platform
> data ? It is good to have documented it in the code too.
Sure, will add the following in-code documentation.
+ /*
+ * TRBE coresight devices do not need regular connections
+ * information, as the paths get built between all percpu
+ * source and their respective percpu sink devices. Though
+ * coresight_register() expect device connections via the
+ * platform_data, which TRBE devices do not have. As they
+ * are not real ACPI devices, coresight_get_platform_dat()
+ * ends up failing. Instead let's allocate a dummy zeroed
+ * coresight_platform_data structure and assign that back
+ * into the device for that purpose.
+ */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists