linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform device for TRBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c26e6cc-d75a-e89f-4ecc-54170df2ed47@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:31:24 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, suzuki.poulose@....com
Cc:     Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] arm_pmu: acpi: Add a representative platform
 device for TRBE



On 8/3/23 11:26, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> ACPI TRBE does not have a HID for identification which could create and add
> a platform device into the platform bus. Also without a platform device, it
> cannot be probed and bound to a platform driver.
> 
> This creates a dummy platform device for TRBE after ascertaining that ACPI
> provides required interrupts uniformly across all cpus on the system. This
> device gets created inside drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c to accommodate TRBE
> being built as a module.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c   | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h  |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index bd68e1b7f29f..4d537d56eb84 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
>  #define ACPI_MADT_GICC_SPE  (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
>  	spe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
>  
> +#define ACPI_MADT_GICC_TRBE  (offsetof(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, \
> +	trbe_interrupt) + sizeof(u16))
> +
>  /* Basic configuration for ACPI */
>  #ifdef	CONFIG_ACPI
>  pgprot_t __acpi_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr);
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> index 235c14766a36..79feea548e6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void arm_pmu_acpi_unregister_irq(int cpu)
>  		acpi_unregister_gsi(gsi);
>  }
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU)
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE)

Rather than adding IS_ENABLED() checks for all applicable configs in future
which will need to call arm_acpi_register_pmu_device() for a dummy platform
device, could we instead just add __maybe_unused for the function to prevent
build warning when there are no call sites ? Seems bit better and simpler.

>  static int
>  arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 len,
>  			     u16 (*parse_gsi)(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *))
> @@ -166,6 +166,40 @@ static inline void arm_spe_acpi_register_device(void)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SPE_PMU */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE
> +static struct resource trbe_resources[] = {
> +	{
> +		/* irq */
> +		.flags          = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> +	}
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_device trbe_dev = {
> +	.name = ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME,
> +	.id = -1,
> +	.resource = trbe_resources,
> +	.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(trbe_resources)
> +};
> +
> +static u16 arm_trbe_parse_gsi(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc)
> +{
> +	return gicc->trbe_interrupt;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_trbe_acpi_register_device(void)
> +{
> +	int ret = arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(&trbe_dev, ACPI_MADT_GICC_TRBE,
> +					       arm_trbe_parse_gsi);
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_warn("ACPI: TRBE: Unable to register device\n");
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void arm_trbe_acpi_register_device(void)
> +{
> +
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CORESIGHT_TRBE */
> +
>  static int arm_pmu_acpi_parse_irqs(void)
>  {
>  	int irq, cpu, irq_cpu, err;
> @@ -401,6 +435,7 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_init(void)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	arm_spe_acpi_register_device();
> +	arm_trbe_acpi_register_device();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index a0801f68762b..143fbc10ecfe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -187,5 +187,6 @@ void armpmu_free_irq(int irq, int cpu);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_PMU */
>  
>  #define ARMV8_SPE_PDEV_NAME "arm,spe-v1"
> +#define ARMV8_TRBE_PDEV_NAME "arm,trbe"
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM_PMU_H__ */