lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230804101317.460697-1-james.clark@arm.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Aug 2023 11:13:10 +0100
From:   James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To:     coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] coresight: Support exclude_guest with Feat_TRF and nVHE

Hi,

I'm looking for help in testing this and for feedback on whether it's
useful to anyone. Testing it requires hardware that has Feat_TRF (v8.4)
but no TRBE. This is because TRBE usage is disabled in nVHE guests.

I don't currently have any access to any hardware, and the FVP model
can only do self hosted trace using TRBE.

Currently with nVHE you would always get trace from guests, and
filtering out isn't possible without this patchset. In comparison, with
VHE guests, they never generate guest trace without [1]. I think the
existence of trace rather than lack of could suggest that this change is
less useful than [1]. Also the restricted set of hardware that it works
on supports that too. 

Apart from compilation and checking that the exclude guest settings
are correctly programmed on guest switch, this is untested by me.

Applies to kvmarm/next (3b4e3afb2032)

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20230804085219.260790-3-james.clark@arm.com/

James Clark (3):
  arm64: KVM: Add support for exclude_guest and exclude_host for ETM
  arm64: KVM: Support exclude_guest for Coresight trace in nVHE
  coresight: Support exclude_guest with Feat_TRF and nVHE

 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h             | 10 +++-
 arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile                       |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                          |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c                        |  7 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/etm.c                          | 48 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/debug-sr.c            | 56 +++++++++++++++++--
 .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c  |  4 ++
 include/kvm/etm.h                             | 43 ++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/etm.c
 create mode 100644 include/kvm/etm.h

-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ