lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d41d3ae3-9c1b-661-4664-51d62ad1d786@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:43:32 +0300 (EEST)
From:   Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     xingtong_wu@....com
cc:     hdegoede@...hat.com, markgross@...nel.org, xingtong.wu@...mens.com,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gerd.haeussler.ext@...mens.com, tobias.schaffner@...mens.com,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/siemens: simatic-ipc-batt: fix logic
 error for BX-59A

On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, xingtong_wu@....com wrote:

> From: "xingtong.wu" <xingtong.wu@...mens.com>
> 
> There is a bug in if statement that lead to logical error
> and have influence to other IPC, it get correct now.
> 
> Fixes: c56beff20375 ("platform/x86/siemens: simatic-ipc-batt: add support for module BX-59A")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308010001.BGYCSQrl-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: xingtong.wu <xingtong.wu@...mens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/siemens/simatic-ipc-batt.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/siemens/simatic-ipc-batt.c b/drivers/platform/x86/siemens/simatic-ipc-batt.c
> index d66b9969234b..e6c12c52843c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/siemens/simatic-ipc-batt.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/siemens/simatic-ipc-batt.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ int simatic_ipc_batt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct gpiod_lookup_tab
>  
>  	if (table->table[2].key) {
>  		flags = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH;
> -		if (priv.devmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_BX_21A || SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_BX_59A)
> +		if (priv.devmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_BX_21A ||
> +		    priv.devmode == SIMATIC_IPC_DEVICE_BX_59A)
>  			flags = GPIOD_OUT_LOW;
>  		priv.gpios[2] = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "CMOSBattery meter", 2, flags);
>  		if (IS_ERR(priv.gpios[2])) {
> 

The code change is fine but please try to improve the changelog (has 
similar problems as the other one).

Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ