[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1eec01ce-5d14-e6f0-c399-ad14e6d176a9@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 13:11:32 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] media: venus: core: Add SC8280XP resource struct
On 04/08/2023 22:17, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 4.08.2023 23:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 04/08/2023 22:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> Would it not be more legitimate and logical to have 8350 use 8280xp's frequency table, instead of 8250 ?
>>> top freq is higher on 8280
>>
>> Still though its a bit suspicious 8350 doesn't have its own table.
>>
>> Are we missing the downstream reference ?
> 8250:
> qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
>
> 8350:
> qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>;
>
> (identical)
>
> Konrad
Fair enough
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists