linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230805012039.lnekkg7zcspvsnkl@intel.intel>
Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2023 03:20:39 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
Cc:     Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: Move system PM hooks to the NOIRQ phase

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:35:51AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 01:38:57PM -0700, Samuel Holland wrote:
> > When an I2C device contains a wake IRQ subordinate to a regmap-irq chip,
> > the regmap-irq code must be able to perform I2C transactions during
> > suspend_device_irqs() and resume_device_irqs(). Therefore, the bus must
> > be suspended/resumed during the NOIRQ phase.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
> 
> it's OK for me.
> 
> Peter, any comment on this?

a kind ping...

Andi