linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Refactor gb_audio_gb_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2023 19:14:30 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To:     Madhumitha Prabakaran <madhumithabiw@...il.com>
Cc:     vaibhav.sr@...il.com, mgreer@...malcreek.com, johan@...nel.org,
        elder@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        ivan.orlov0322@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Refactor gb_audio_gb_get_topology()
 into separate calls

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:31:34PM -0500, Madhumitha Prabakaran wrote:
> Refactor gb_audio_gb_get_topology() into separate calls for better modularity.
> 

This is too vague.  Just say "There is a comment which says 'Split into
separate calls' so I have done it."  But actually, please just delete
the comment instead.  This code is already an endless series of wrappers
around wrappers.

Also, please run your patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl.

Btw, I just want to emphasize again that I was 100% serious when I asked
you to delete the comment.

regards,
dan carpenter