| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230805055537.147835-1-hch@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 07:55:37 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: minchan@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dusty Mabe <dusty@...tymabe.com>
Subject: [PATCH] zram: take device and not only bvec offset into account
Commit af8b04c63708 ("zram: simplify bvec iteration in
__zram_make_request") changed the bio iteration in zram to rely on the
implicit capping to page boundaries in bio_for_each_segment. But it
failed to care for the fact zram not only care about the page alignment
of the bio payload, but also the page alignment into the device. For
buffered I/O and swap those are the same, but for direct I/O or kernel
internal I/O like XFS log buffer writes they can differ.
Fix this by open coding bio_for_each_segment and limiting the bvec len
so that it never crosses over a page alignment boundary in the device
in addition to the payload boundary already taken care of by
bio_iter_iovec.
Fixes: af8b04c63708 ("zram: simplify bvec iteration in __zram_make_request")
Reported-by: Dusty Mabe <dusty@...tymabe.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 5676e6dd5b1672..06673c6ca25555 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1870,15 +1870,16 @@ static void zram_bio_discard(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
static void zram_bio_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
{
- struct bvec_iter iter;
- struct bio_vec bv;
- unsigned long start_time;
+ unsigned long start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
+ struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
- start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
- bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) {
+ do {
u32 index = iter.bi_sector >> SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
u32 offset = (iter.bi_sector & (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) <<
SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ struct bio_vec bv = bio_iter_iovec(bio, iter);
+
+ bv.bv_len = min_t(u32, bv.bv_len, PAGE_SIZE - offset);
if (zram_bvec_read(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio) < 0) {
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.failed_reads);
@@ -1890,22 +1891,26 @@ static void zram_bio_read(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_accessed(zram, index);
zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
- }
+
+ bio_advance_iter_single(bio, &iter, bv.bv_len);
+ } while (iter.bi_size);
+
bio_end_io_acct(bio, start_time);
bio_endio(bio);
}
static void zram_bio_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
{
- struct bvec_iter iter;
- struct bio_vec bv;
- unsigned long start_time;
+ unsigned long start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
+ struct bvec_iter iter = bio->bi_iter;
- start_time = bio_start_io_acct(bio);
- bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) {
+ do {
u32 index = iter.bi_sector >> SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
u32 offset = (iter.bi_sector & (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) <<
SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ struct bio_vec bv = bio_iter_iovec(bio, iter);
+
+ bv.bv_len = min_t(u32, bv.bv_len, PAGE_SIZE - offset);
if (zram_bvec_write(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio) < 0) {
atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.failed_writes);
@@ -1916,7 +1921,10 @@ static void zram_bio_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
zram_slot_lock(zram, index);
zram_accessed(zram, index);
zram_slot_unlock(zram, index);
- }
+
+ bio_advance_iter_single(bio, &iter, bv.bv_len);
+ } while (iter.bi_size);
+
bio_end_io_acct(bio, start_time);
bio_endio(bio);
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists