| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 17:07:51 +0100
From: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>,
Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] rust: init: add support for arbitrary paths in
init macros
On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 09:10:16 +0000
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me> wrote:
> Previously only `ident` and generic types were supported in the
> `{try_}{pin_}init!` macros. This patch allows arbitrary path fragments,
> so for example `Foo::Bar` but also very complex paths such as
> `<Foo as Baz>::Bar::<0, i32>`.
>
> Internally this is accomplished by using `path` fragments. Due to some
> peculiar declarative macro limitations, we have to "forget" certain
> additional parsing information in the token trees. This is achieved by
> using the `paste!` proc macro. It does not actually modify the input,
> since no `[< >]` will be present in the input, so it just strips the
> information held by declarative macros. For example, if a declarative
> macro takes `$t:path` as its input, it cannot sensibly propagate this to
> a macro that takes `$($p:tt)*` as its input, since the `$t` token will
> only be considered one `tt` token for the second macro. If we first pipe
> the tokens through `paste!`, then it parses as expected.
>
> Suggested-by: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
> Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - added Reviewed-by's from Martin and Alice.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - use Gary's `paste!` macro instead of `retokenize`,
> - remove the retokenize macro.
>
> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
> index 4c86281301d8..d54243cd3c82 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/init/macros.rs
> @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ impl<$($impl_generics)*> $pin_data<$($ty_generics)*>
> macro_rules! __init_internal {
> (
> @this($($this:ident)?),
> - @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
> + @typ($t:path),
> @fields($($fields:tt)*),
> @error($err:ty),
> // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
> @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> ) => {
> $crate::__init_internal!(with_update_parsed:
> @this($($this)?),
> - @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
> + @typ($t),
> @fields($($fields)*),
> @error($err),
> @data($data, $($use_data)?),
> @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> };
> (
> @this($($this:ident)?),
> - @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
> + @typ($t:path),
> @fields($($fields:tt)*),
> @error($err:ty),
> // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
> @@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> ) => {
> $crate::__init_internal!(with_update_parsed:
> @this($($this)?),
> - @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
> + @typ($t),
> @fields($($fields)*),
> @error($err),
> @data($data, $($use_data)?),
> @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> };
> (
> @this($($this:ident)?),
> - @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
> + @typ($t:path),
> @fields($($fields:tt)*),
> @error($err:ty),
> // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
> @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> ) => {
> $crate::__init_internal!(
> @this($($this)?),
> - @typ($t $(::<$($generics),*>)? ),
> + @typ($t),
> @fields($($fields)*),
> @error($err),
> @data($data, $($use_data)?),
> @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> };
> (with_update_parsed:
> @this($($this:ident)?),
> - @typ($t:ident $(::<$($generics:ty),*>)?),
> + @typ($t:path),
> @fields($($fields:tt)*),
> @error($err:ty),
> // Either `PinData` or `InitData`, `$use_data` should only be present in the `PinData`
> @@ -1094,7 +1094,11 @@ macro_rules! __init_internal {
> // Get the data about fields from the supplied type.
> let data = unsafe {
> use $crate::init::__internal::$has_data;
> - $t$(::<$($generics),*>)?::$get_data()
> + // Here we abuse `paste!` to retokenize `$t`. Declarative macros have some internal
> + // information that is associated to already parsed fragments, so a path fragment
> + // cannot be used in this position. Doing the retokenization results in valid rust
> + // code.
> + ::kernel::macros::paste!($t::$get_data())
> };
> // Ensure that `data` really is of type `$data` and help with type inference:
> let init = $crate::init::__internal::$data::make_closure::<_, __InitOk, $err>(
> @@ -1253,7 +1257,7 @@ fn assert_zeroable<T: $crate::init::Zeroable>(_: *mut T) {}
> };
> (make_initializer:
> @slot($slot:ident),
> - @type_name($t:ident),
> + @type_name($t:path),
> @munch_fields(..Zeroable::zeroed() $(,)?),
> @acc($($acc:tt)*),
> ) => {
> @@ -1270,15 +1274,21 @@ fn assert_zeroable<T: $crate::init::Zeroable>(_: *mut T) {}
> // not get executed, so it has no effect.
> ::core::ptr::write($slot, zeroed);
> zeroed = ::core::mem::zeroed();
> - ::core::ptr::write($slot, $t {
> - $($acc)*
> - ..zeroed
> - });
> + // Here we abuse `paste!` to retokenize `$t`. Declarative macros have some internal
> + // information that is associated to already parsed fragments, so a path fragment
> + // cannot be used in this position. Doing the retokenization results in valid rust
> + // code.
> + ::kernel::macros::paste!(
> + ::core::ptr::write($slot, $t {
> + $($acc)*
> + ..zeroed
> + });
> + );
> }
> };
> (make_initializer:
> @slot($slot:ident),
> - @type_name($t:ident),
> + @type_name($t:path),
> @munch_fields($(,)?),
> @acc($($acc:tt)*),
> ) => {
> @@ -1286,14 +1296,20 @@ fn assert_zeroable<T: $crate::init::Zeroable>(_: *mut T) {}
> // Since we are in the closure that is never called, this will never get executed.
> // We abuse `slot` to get the correct type inference here:
> unsafe {
> - ::core::ptr::write($slot, $t {
> - $($acc)*
> - });
> + // Here we abuse `paste!` to retokenize `$t`. Declarative macros have some internal
> + // information that is associated to already parsed fragments, so a path fragment
> + // cannot be used in this position. Doing the retokenization results in valid rust
> + // code.
> + ::kernel::macros::paste!(
> + ::core::ptr::write($slot, $t {
> + $($acc)*
> + });
> + );
> }
> };
> (make_initializer:
> @slot($slot:ident),
> - @type_name($t:ident),
> + @type_name($t:path),
> @munch_fields($field:ident <- $val:expr, $($rest:tt)*),
> @acc($($acc:tt)*),
> ) => {
> @@ -1306,7 +1322,7 @@ fn assert_zeroable<T: $crate::init::Zeroable>(_: *mut T) {}
> };
> (make_initializer:
> @slot($slot:ident),
> - @type_name($t:ident),
> + @type_name($t:path),
> @munch_fields($field:ident $(: $val:expr)?, $($rest:tt)*),
> @acc($($acc:tt)*),
> ) => {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists