linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check for O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41b5f092-5422-e461-b9bf-3a5a04c0b9e2@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sat, 5 Aug 2023 18:29:15 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] io_uring: correct check for O_TMPFILE

On 8/5/23 4:48?PM, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> O_TMPFILE is actually __O_TMPFILE|O_DIRECTORY. This means that the old
> check for whether RESOLVE_CACHED can be used would incorrectly think
> that O_DIRECTORY could not be used with RESOLVE_CACHED.
> 
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.12+
> Fixes: 3a81fd02045c ("io_uring: enable LOOKUP_CACHED path resolution for filename lookups")
> Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> ---
>  io_uring/openclose.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/io_uring/openclose.c b/io_uring/openclose.c
> index 10ca57f5bd24..a029c230119f 100644
> --- a/io_uring/openclose.c
> +++ b/io_uring/openclose.c
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ static bool io_openat_force_async(struct io_open *open)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't bother trying for O_TRUNC, O_CREAT, or O_TMPFILE open,
> -	 * it'll always -EAGAIN
> +	 * it'll always -EAGAIN.

Please don't make this change, it just detracts from the actual change.
And if we are making changes in there, why not change O_TMPFILE as well
since this is what the change is about?

-- 
Jens Axboe