[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZM9y93rVVnIIQzzP@xhacker>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 18:16:23 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: fall back to poll if there's no
interrupt
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 12:20:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 05:20:54PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > When there's no irq(this can be due to various reasons, for example,
> > no irq from HW support, or we just want to use poll solution, and so
> > on), falling back to poll is still better than no support at all.
>
> Ouch, really? Why not just fix the hardware instead?
>
Hi Greg,
The HW may be designed as that to save interrupt lines if the uart
is dedicated to debug purpose. I also see similar support in other
uart drivers, for example liteuart.c, altera_uart.c, altera_jtaguart.c
8250_ioc3.c and so on.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists