linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable GPIO nodes at the board level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <191d171b-aa8d-3727-f5ad-9c25bfff96fe@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:16:25 -0500
From:   Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC:     Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200: Enable GPIO nodes at the
 board level

On 8/7/23 10:42 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:28-20230807, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> On 8/7/23 12:38 AM, Dhruva Gole wrote:
>>> Andrew,
>>>
>>> On 03/08/23 02:23, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>>> GPIO nodes defined in the top-level J7200 SoC dtsi files are incomplete
>>>> and may not be functional unless they are extended with pinmux and
>>>> device information.
>>>>
>>>> Disable the GPIO nodes in the dtsi files and only enable the ones that
>>>> are actually pinned out on a given board.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 18 ++++--------------
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi      |  4 ++++
>>>>    .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi |  2 ++
>>>>    3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> index dee9056f56051..4a5c4f36baeec 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
>>>> @@ -240,27 +240,17 @@ &main_uart3 {
>>>>        pinctrl-0 = <&main_uart3_pins_default>;
>>>>    };
>>>> -&main_gpio2 {
>>>> -    status = "disabled";
>>>> -};
>>>> -
>>>> -&main_gpio4 {
>>>> -    status = "disabled";
>>>> -};
>>>> -
>>>> -&main_gpio6 {
>>>> -    status = "disabled";
>>>> +&main_gpio0 {
>>>> +    status = "okay";
>>>> +    /* default pins */
>>>
>>> Small question, where is the pmx for main_gpio0? What does "default pins"
>>> refer to here? Where are they pinmuxed?
>>>
>>
>> Good question, where is the pmx for main_gpio0? I don't know, it was
>> never defined before either, we only are noticing this now as we are
>> disabling by default instead of leaving an unfinished node enabled
>> by default. (another benefit of this disabled by default scheme).
>>
>> What is really happening is GPIO nodes we tend to pinmux differently
>> than normal device nodes. Their pinmux selections tends to be spread
>> out in all the nodes that make use of these GPIO pins, not all together
>> here in this node.
>>
>> For instance in this device we use one of the main_gpio0 pins as a
>> GPIO toggled regulator, and we define the pinmux for it in that node
>> (see vdd-sd-dv-default-pins).
>>
>> We can either define the rest of the pins not used elsewhere
>> here, or we can consider GPIO an exception to the rule, I'd say
>> the latter is fine for now.
> 
> 
> GPIO pinmux are typically defined where they need - the only place where
> they are explicitly called out in gpio is when they are meant to be used by
> libgpio - typically in the case of dev boards.
> 
> Just drop the comments of /* default pins */ - that is just mis-leading.
> 

True, will drop the comment for v2.

Andrew