[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230807050531.GB49200@system.software.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 14:05:31 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kernel_team@...ynix.com" <kernel_team@...ynix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"xhao@...ux.alibaba.com" <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios
at migration
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:32:30PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> The patch in its current form, I am afraid, is very very hard to review.
> It is way too big and is missing comments. Having CONFIG_MIGRC makes no
> sense (I guess it is intended to be a “chicken-bit”). Variable and
> function names are not informative. The memory barriers are handle
> improperly (please check again the smp_mb__after_atomic() rules).
I checked it. I found what I was wrong at. Thank you for pointing it out.
I will fix it from the next spin.
Byungchul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists