linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd: Introduce AMD Address Translation Library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58934edf-4fad-48e0-bc5d-62712b11e607@amd.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 16:44:08 -0400
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     bp@...en8.de, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        markgross@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     yazen.ghannam@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        avadhut.naik@....com, mario.limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd: Introduce AMD Address Translation
 Library

On 8/2/2023 2:55 PM, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> AMD Zen-based systems report memory errors through Machine Check banks
> representing Unified Memory Controllers (UMCs). The address value
> reported for DRAM ECC errors is a "normalized address" that is relative
> to the UMC. This normalized address must be converted to a system
> physical address to be usable by the OS.
> 
> Support for this address translation was introduced to the MCA subsystem
> with Zen1 systems. The code was later moved to the AMD64 EDAC module,
> since this was the only user of the code at the time.
> 
> However, there are uses for this translation outside of EDAC. The system
> physical address can be used in MCA for preemptive page offlining as done
> in some MCA notifier functions. Also, this translation is needed as the
> basis of similar functionality needed for some CXL configurations on AMD
> systems.
> 
> Introduce a common address translation library that can be used for
> multiple subsystems including MCA, EDAC, and CXL.
> 
> Include support for UMC normalized to system physical address
> translation for current CPU systems.
> 
> Future development to include:
> - DF4.5 Non-power-of-2 interleaving modes.
> - Heterogeneous CPU+GPU system support.
> - CXL translation support.
> - Caching of common intermediate values and results.
> - Leverage UEFI PRM methods as alternate backends to existing native
>    code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS                                |   7 +
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/Kconfig           |   1 +
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/Makefile          |   1 +
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/Kconfig       |  20 +
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/Makefile      |  18 +
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/access.c      | 107 ++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/core.c        | 212 +++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/dehash.c      | 459 ++++++++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/denormalize.c | 644 ++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/internal.h    | 307 ++++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/map.c         | 659 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/reg_fields.h  | 603 +++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/system.c      | 282 +++++++++
>   drivers/platform/x86/amd/atl/umc.c         |  53 ++
>   include/linux/amd-atl.h                    |  18 +
>

Hi all,

I'd like to get feedback on the most appropriate place for this code.

I want to move this out of EDAC, since it's not really an EDAC feature. 
And it needs to be used by subsystems other than EDAC.

I thought x86 Platform Drivers, because the code is very 
platform-specific. And there are already some AMD platform drivers. But 
there isn't any platform control or management for this translation. 
It's just reading registers and calculating values. So it's not really a 
"platform driver" in the sense that it manages platform-specific behavior.

Another option is for this code to be in arch/x86/ras/. But I would like 
the option for this code to be built as a module, at least for debug and 
development. And I don't know that modules, nor platform-specific code, 
should be in arch/.

Currently, I think this could go in drivers/ras/. This address 
translation is needed for RAS use cases, so making it a part of "RAS 
Infrastructure" may make the most sense.

Boris, Tony, (and others) what do you think?

Thanks,
Yazen