[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230807211659.GKZNFfS+7PK71yYt0p@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 23:16:59 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [RESEND] x86: avoid unneeded __div64_32 function
definition
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:37:00PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Otherwise you risk `__div64_32(n, base)' getting expanded to `(n, base)',
You mean in the very obscure case of a 32-bit kernel where they don't call
do_div() but call this low level function?
I'd say if they can't be bothered to even grep the tree for the right usage,
they deserve both pieces... :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists