linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add a node for the second serdes PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c52b2eed-d546-4027-bfb9-f3d964f025a9@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 23:48:24 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p: add a node for the second
 serdes PHY

> That wording of "match downstream sources" is amiguous, sorry.
> 
> What I meant was that:
> 
>     1. This looks like a properly formatted dtsi node, follows
>        conventions in the file for ordering, etc
>     2. The downstream devicetree from Qualcomm uses the same MMIO region
>        same dependencies for clocks, etc. I do not have documentation
>        to further review past that

O.K. This does make your reviews worthwhile.

Vendor crap gets that name for a reason. So just saying it is the same
as the vendor code is not really helpful. So i would avoid this
ambiguous statement. And your later comment on a patch which points
out real problems adds to my confidence you did a real review.

Thanks
	  Andrew