lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da679b5e-6712-4849-b29c-6aa42022abc4@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 23:51:40 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8775p-ride: move the reset-gpios
 property of the PHY

> > I have proposed a solution for this problem in 2020 but it never got
> > upstream. Now we have a workaround in place which allows us to hard-code
> > the PHY id in the compatible property, thus skipping the ID scanning).
> 
> nitpicky, but I think that already existed at that time :D

Yes, it has been there are long long time. It is however only in the
last 5 years of so has it been seen as a solution to the chicken egg
problem.

> >  		sgmii_phy: phy@8 {
> > +			compatible = "ethernet-phy-id0141.0dd4";
> >  			reg = <0x8>;
> >  			device_type = "ethernet-phy";
> > +			reset-gpios = <&pmm8654au_2_gpios 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > +			reset-deassert-us = <70000>;
> 
> Doesn't this need reset-assert-us?

If i remember correctly, there is a default value if DT does not
provide one.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ