[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169139090386.324433.6412259486776991296.stgit@devnote2>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:48:24 +0900
From: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] bpf: fprobe: rethook: Use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs
Hi,
Here is the 2nd version of RFC series to use ftrace_regs instead of pt_regs.
But this includes the generic part and minimum modifications of arch
dependent code. (e.g. not including rethook for arm64.) This series is based
on the discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230801112036.0d4ee60d@gandalf.local.home/
This version includes 1 patch to expose ftrace_regs. so
- Simply replace pt_regs in fprobe_entry_handler with ftrace_regs.
- Expose ftrace_regs even if CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER=n.
- Replace pt_regs in rethook and fprobe_exit_handler with ftrace_regs. This
introduce a new HAVE_PT_REGS_COMPAT_FTRACE_REGS which means ftrace_regs is
just a wrapper of pt_regs (except for arm64, other architectures do this)
- Update fprobe-events to use ftrace_regs natively.
- Introduce ftrace_partial_regs(). (This changes ARM64 which needs a custom
implementation)
- Update bpf multi-kprobe handler use ftrace_partial_regs().
Florent, feel free to add your rethook for arm64, but please do not remove
kretprobe trampoline yet. It is another discussion point. We may be possible
to use ftrace_regs for kretprobe by ftrace_partial_regs() but kretprobe
allows nest probe. (maybe we can skip that case?)
This series can also be found below branch.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhiramat/linux.git/log/?h=topic/fprobe-ftrace-regs
Thank you,
---
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (6):
fprobe: Use fprobe_regs in fprobe entry handler
tracing: Expose ftrace_regs regardless of CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
fprobe: rethook: Use fprobe_regs in fprobe exit handler and rethook
tracing/fprobe: Enable fprobe events with CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS
ftrace: Add ftrace_partial_regs() for converting ftrace_regs to pt_regs
bpf: Enable kprobe_multi feature if CONFIG_FPROBE is enabled
arch/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h | 11 ++++++
arch/loongarch/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/rethook.c | 9 +++--
include/linux/fprobe.h | 4 +-
include/linux/ftrace.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/rethook.h | 11 +++---
kernel/kprobes.c | 9 ++++-
kernel/trace/Kconfig | 9 ++++-
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 14 +++++--
kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 8 ++--
kernel/trace/rethook.c | 16 ++++----
kernel/trace/trace_fprobe.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
kernel/trace/trace_probe_tmpl.h | 2 +
lib/test_fprobe.c | 10 +++--
samples/fprobe/fprobe_example.c | 4 +-
18 files changed, 154 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists