[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66287e45-f2ed-7010-95f4-9a307108795b@starfivetech.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 09:51:09 +0800
From: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: Add mmc node
On 2023/8/5 21:14, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 13:26, William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com> wrote:
>> On 2023/2/15 20:22, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
>> > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 13:12, Emil Renner Berthing
>> > <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 12:35, William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Add the mmc node for the StarFive JH7110 SoC.
>> >> > Set mmco node to emmc and set mmc1 node to sd.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@...rfivetech.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > .../jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi | 23 +++++++++
>> >> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
>> >> > index c60280b89c73..e1a0248e907f 100644
>> >> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
>> >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-starfive-visionfive-2.dtsi
>> >> > @@ -42,6 +42,29 @@ &rtc_osc {
>> >> > clock-frequency = <32768>;
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > +&mmc0 {
>> >> > + max-frequency = <100000000>;
>> >> > + bus-width = <8>;
>> >> > + cap-mmc-highspeed;
>> >> > + mmc-ddr-1_8v;
>> >> > + mmc-hs200-1_8v;
>> >> > + non-removable;
>> >> > + cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>> >> > + post-power-on-delay-ms = <200>;
>> >> > + status = "okay";
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >> > +&mmc1 {
>> >> > + max-frequency = <100000000>;
>> >> > + bus-width = <4>;
>> >> > + no-sdio;
>> >> > + no-mmc;
>> >> > + broken-cd;
>> >> > + cap-sd-highspeed;
>> >> > + post-power-on-delay-ms = <200>;
>> >> > + status = "okay";
>> >> > +};
>> >
>> > These nodes are also still oddly placed in the middle of the external
>> > clocks. Again please keep the external clocks at the top and then
>> > order the nodes alphabetically to have some sort of system.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Hi Emil,
>>
>> I'll update it in next version.
>
> Hi William,
>
> It seems the mmc nodes are still missing from the upstream device
> tree. The sysreg nodes have been added in Conors riscv-dt-for-next[1]
> branch, so I don't see any missing dependencies. Could you please
> update and send a new version of this?
>
> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-dt-for-next
>
> /Emil
>
Hi Emil,
I will start to do the upstream work of this part from this week.
Since the mmc driver has some modifications, I will send a separate
patch series.
Best Regards,
William
>> Best Regards
>> William
>>
>> >> > &gmac0_rmii_refin {
>> >> > clock-frequency = <50000000>;
>> >> > };
>> >> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> >> > index 64d260ea1f29..17f7b3ee6ca3 100644
>> >> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> >> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> >> > @@ -314,6 +314,11 @@ uart2: serial@...20000 {
>> >> > status = "disabled";
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > + stg_syscon: syscon@...40000 {
>> >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon", "syscon";
>> >> > + reg = <0x0 0x10240000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> >> > + };
>> >> > +
>> >> > uart3: serial@...00000 {
>> >> > compatible = "snps,dw-apb-uart";
>> >> > reg = <0x0 0x12000000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> >> > @@ -370,6 +375,11 @@ syscrg: clock-controller@...20000 {
>> >> > #reset-cells = <1>;
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > + sys_syscon: syscon@...30000 {
>> >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon", "syscon";
>> >> > + reg = <0x0 0x13030000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> >> > + };
>> >> > +
>> >> > gpio: gpio@...40000 {
>> >> > compatible = "starfive,jh7110-sys-pinctrl";
>> >> > reg = <0x0 0x13040000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> >> > @@ -397,6 +407,11 @@ aoncrg: clock-controller@...00000 {
>> >> > #reset-cells = <1>;
>> >> > };
>> >> >
>> >> > + aon_syscon: syscon@...10000 {
>> >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon", "syscon";
>> >> > + reg = <0x0 0x17010000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> >> > + };
>> >> > +
>> >> > gpioa: gpio@...20000 {
>> >> > compatible = "starfive,jh7110-aon-pinctrl";
>> >> > reg = <0x0 0x17020000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> >> > @@ -407,5 +422,37 @@ gpioa: gpio@...20000 {
>> >> > gpio-controller;
>> >> > #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> >> > };
>> >> > +
>> >> > + mmc0: mmc@...10000 {
>> >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-mmc";
>> >> > + reg = <0x0 0x16010000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> >> > + clocks = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_SDIO0_AHB>,
>> >> > + <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_SDIO0_SDCARD>;
>> >> > + clock-names = "biu","ciu";
>> >> > + resets = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSRST_SDIO0_AHB>;
>> >> > + reset-names = "reset";
>> >> > + interrupts = <74>;
>> >> > + fifo-depth = <32>;
>> >> > + fifo-watermark-aligned;
>> >> > + data-addr = <0>;
>> >> > + starfive,sysreg = <&sys_syscon 0x14 0x1a 0x7c000000>;
>> >> > + status = "disabled";
>> >> > + };
>> >> > +
>> >> > + mmc1: mmc@...20000 {
>> >> > + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-mmc";
>> >> > + reg = <0x0 0x16020000 0x0 0x10000>;
>> >> > + clocks = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_SDIO1_AHB>,
>> >> > + <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_SDIO1_SDCARD>;
>> >> > + clock-names = "biu","ciu";
>> >> > + resets = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSRST_SDIO1_AHB>;
>> >> > + reset-names = "reset";
>> >> > + interrupts = <75>;
>> >> > + fifo-depth = <32>;
>> >> > + fifo-watermark-aligned;
>> >> > + data-addr = <0>;
>> >> > + starfive,sysreg = <&sys_syscon 0x9c 0x1 0x3e>;
>> >> > + status = "disabled";
>> >> > + };
>> >>
>> >> Hi William,
>> >>
>> >> These nodes still don't seem to be sorted by address, eg. by the
>> >> number after the @
>> >> Also please move the dt-binding patch before this one, so dtb_check
>> >> won't fail no matter where git bisect happens to land.
>> >>
>> >> /Emil
>> >>
>> >> > };
>> >> > };
>> >> > --
>> >> > 2.34.1
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > linux-riscv mailing list
>> >> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
>> >> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists