[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <110412ae-108a-27ed-b0f7-8f30eab122a2@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 20:02:34 +0800
From: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] perf test: Fix matching_pmu
在 2023/8/7 下午5:21, John Garry 写道:
> On 07/08/2023 08:51, Jing Zhang wrote:
>> The perf_pmu_test_event.matching_pmu didn't work. No matter what its
>> value is, it does not affect the test results. So let matching_pmu be
>> used for matching perf_pmu_test_pmu.pmu.name.
>>
>> Fixes: 5a65c0c8f6fd ("perf test: Re-add pmu-event uncore PMU alias test")
>
> Is this tag correct, as I was not sure if this ever worked?
>
I added the tag with reference to the previous fixed patch, and it seems correct.
> BTW, I am not sure how useful fixes tags are for self-test anyway...
>
I'm not sure if it's useful either, but I added it anyway.:)
>> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang<renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Thank you sincerely!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists