linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V5 3/9] firmware: imx: scu: drop return value check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DU0PR04MB9417EFE75CFAD955BE2A873C880CA@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 03:00:34 +0000
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC:     "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "alexander.stein@...tq-group.com" <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 3/9] firmware: imx: scu: drop return value check

Hi Shawn,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/9] firmware: imx: scu: drop return value check
> 
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 05:04:43PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
> > For IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_UNIQUE_ID, the scfw has a return value, and the
> > imx-scu always return 0. So drop the return value check.
> 
> imx_scu_call_rpc() could fail for a few reason.  Are we not want to check
> those possible failures?

Yes, I overlooked this, drop this patch.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Shawn
> 
> >
> > BTW, also initialize msg to 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-soc.c | 9 ++-------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-soc.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-soc.c
> > index 2f32353de2c9..ef9103987e76 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-soc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-soc.c
> > @@ -33,20 +33,15 @@ struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_uid {
> >
> >  static int imx_scu_soc_uid(u64 *soc_uid)  {
> > -	struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_uid msg;
> > +	struct imx_sc_msg_misc_get_soc_uid msg = { 0 };
> >  	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg *hdr = &msg.hdr;
> > -	int ret;
> >
> >  	hdr->ver = IMX_SC_RPC_VERSION;
> >  	hdr->svc = IMX_SC_RPC_SVC_MISC;
> >  	hdr->func = IMX_SC_MISC_FUNC_UNIQUE_ID;
> >  	hdr->size = 1;
> >
> > -	ret = imx_scu_call_rpc(imx_sc_soc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
> > -	if (ret) {
> > -		pr_err("%s: get soc uid failed, ret %d\n", __func__, ret);
> > -		return ret;
> > -	}
> > +	imx_scu_call_rpc(imx_sc_soc_ipc_handle, &msg, true);
> >
> >  	*soc_uid = msg.uid_high;
> >  	*soc_uid <<= 32;
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >