[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZND0HuR2aUt_vd3D@alley>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:39:42 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@...iatek.com>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] watchdog/hardlockup: Avoid large stack frames in
watchdog_hardlockup_check()
On Fri 2023-08-04 07:00:43, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> After commit 77c12fc95980 ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to
> watchdog_hardlockup_check()") we started storing a `struct cpumask` on
> the stack in watchdog_hardlockup_check(). On systems with
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS set to 8192 this takes up 1K on the stack. That
> triggers warnings with `CONFIG_FRAME_WARN` set to 1024.
>
> We'll use the new trigger_allbutcpu_cpu_backtrace() to avoid needing
> to use a CPU mask at all.
>
> Fixes: 77c12fc95980 ("watchdog/hardlockup: add a "cpu" param to watchdog_hardlockup_check()")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307310955.pLZDhpnl-lkp@intel.com
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists