linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: configs: s5pv210_defconfig: enable IIO required by MAX17040

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af8893b8-0556-e355-abe9-aba99c7a839a@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 7 Aug 2023 15:51:43 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
Cc:     Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>,
        Iskren Chernev <me@...ren.info>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Matheus Castello <matheus@...tello.eng.br>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Stefan Hansson <newbie13xd@...il.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: configs: s5pv210_defconfig: enable IIO
 required by MAX17040

On 07/08/2023 10:55, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 10:29:04AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/08/2023 00:42, Andi Shyti wrote:
>>> Hi Svyatoslav,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:36:13AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>> After adding support for passing temperature data from thermal sensor
>>>> to MAX17040 it got dependency on CONFIG_IIO. From all defconfigs
>>>> using MAX17040 only s5pv210_defconfig did not have IIO already enabled
>>>> so let's enable it to avoid regression.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/configs/s5pv210_defconfig | 1 +
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/s5pv210_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/s5pv210_defconfig
>>>> index 4c1e480b5bbd..24070ee3d43e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/s5pv210_defconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/s5pv210_defconfig
>>>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_S3C_DMA=y
>>>>  CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y
>>>>  CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX8998=m
>>>>  CONFIG_DMADEVICES=y
>>>> +CONFIG_IIO=y
>>>>  CONFIG_PWM=y
>>>>  CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG=y
>>>>  CONFIG_PHY_SAMSUNG_USB2=m
>>>
>>> Should this patch be squashed to the previous patch? I think you
>>> break bisectability for this board if you enable iio only here.
>>
>> The defconfig change matters less - distros don't use them - so this
>> points to the fact that patchset affected the users. All existing users
>> of max17040 drivers, who do not enable IIO, will have their setups broken.
> 
> That's why I'm suggesting to squash this patch with the previous.

It would not solve much. All existing users will be still broken.

> 
> Anyway, up to you... except of this note everything looks fine in
> the series.

I would actually prefer not to depend on IIO, but this would require
stubs for missing IIO functions.

Best regards,
Krzysztof