[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 08:10:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Da Xue <da@...re.computer>
Cc: Luke Lu <luke.lu@...re.computer>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: meson-g12a: do post init to fix broken usb
after resumption
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 01:33:45AM -0400, Da Xue wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 12:56 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:25:10AM +0000, Luke Lu wrote:
> > > Device connected to usb otg port of GXL-based boards can not be
> > > recognised after resumption, doesn't recover even if disconnect and
> > > reconnect the device. dmesg shows it disconnects during resumption.
> > >
> > > [ 41.492911] usb 1-2: USB disconnect, device number 3
> > > [ 41.499346] usb 1-2: unregistering device
> > > [ 41.511939] usb 1-2: unregistering interface 1-2:1.0
> > >
> > > Calling usb_post_init() will fix this issue, and it's tested and
> > > verified on libretech's aml-s905x-cc board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luke Lu <luke.lu@...re.computer>
> >
> > What commit id does this fix? Should it also go to stable kernels?
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Suspend device tree flag has not been enabled in-tree for the Amlogic
> GXL (S805X/S905X/S905D) series due it having PSCI 0.2 and thus never
> untested. Most of the suspend resume code was only tested on newer
> G12A/B series.
>
> This and "[PATCH v3] net: phy: meson-gxl: implement
> meson_gxl_phy_resume()" fixes USB and Ethernet after resume. HDMI
> requires another fix.
>
> It would be great if they could go into stable since we are carrying
> these two patches in our tree on 6.1 and they're applicable back to
> 5.4 but I am not sure what the criteria is.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
has the criteria. If you think it should go there, then please resend
with a cc: stable tag in the signed-off-by area.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists