lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 08 Aug 2023 10:01:57 +0900
From:   Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@...sung.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: ufs-pci: Add support for QEMU

On 8/8/23, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 8/6/23 18:37, Jeuk Kim wrote:
>>   static const struct pci_device_id ufshcd_pci_tbl[] = {
>> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT, 0x0013, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 },
>>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_SAMSUNG, 0xC00C, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0 },
> 
> Does Red Hat agree with using device ID 0x0013 for this purpose? Is it 
> guaranteed that this device ID won't be used for any other purpose?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

Yes. 
Red Hat donated part of its device ID range to QEMU, which is 1b36:0001 to 1b36:00ff,
and the QEMU community has accepted UFS to use device ID 1b36:0x0013.

The document can be found at https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/specs/pci-ids.html.
As qemu.git/master is frozen for the next release, you cannot see the QEMU UFS device ID on the page now.
You will be able to see it after about 22 August.

Thanks,
Jeuk

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ