linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/53] x86/topology: The final installment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Aug 2023 00:10:39 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/53] x86/topology: The final installment

On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:41:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_is_processor_usa
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static bool has_lapic_cpus;
> +
>  static int __init
>  acpi_parse_x2apic(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
>  {
> @@ -241,6 +243,14 @@ acpi_parse_lapic(union acpi_subtable_hea
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
> +	 * According to https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#processor-local-x2apic-structure
> +	 * when MADT provides both valid LAPIC and x2APIC entries, the APIC ID
> +	 * in x2APIC must be equal or greater than 0xff.
> +	 */
> +	if (has_lapic_cpus && processor->id < 0xff)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * We need to register disabled CPU as well to permit
>  	 * counting disabled CPUs. This allows us to size
>  	 * cpus_possible_map more accurately, to permit

It works better if you move this hunk into acpi_parse_x2apic() instead.
Then I can indeed confirm it works as advertised -- also having one of
them afflicted ivb-ep machines.

Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 088323ed6179..f6cff99d6087 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ static bool __init acpi_is_processor_usable(u32 lapic_flags)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static bool has_lapic_cpus;
+
 static int __init
 acpi_parse_x2apic(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
 {
@@ -199,6 +201,14 @@ acpi_parse_x2apic(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end)
 	if (!acpi_is_processor_usable(processor->lapic_flags))
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * According to https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#processor-local-x2apic-structure
+	 * when MADT provides both valid LAPIC and x2APIC entries, the APIC ID
+	 * in x2APIC must be equal or greater than 0xff.
+	 */
+	if (has_lapic_cpus && apic_id < 0xff)
+		return 0;
+
 	/*
 	 * We need to register disabled CPU as well to permit
 	 * counting disabled CPUs. This allows us to size
@@ -1072,10 +1083,8 @@ static int __init early_acpi_parse_madt_lapic_addr_ovr(void)
 
 static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
 {
-	int count;
 	int x2count = 0;
-	int ret;
-	struct acpi_subtable_proc madt_proc[2];
+	int count;
 
 	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC))
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -1084,21 +1093,12 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
 				      acpi_parse_sapic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
 
 	if (!count) {
-		memset(madt_proc, 0, sizeof(madt_proc));
-		madt_proc[0].id = ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC;
-		madt_proc[0].handler = acpi_parse_lapic;
-		madt_proc[1].id = ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_X2APIC;
-		madt_proc[1].handler = acpi_parse_x2apic;
-		ret = acpi_table_parse_entries_array(ACPI_SIG_MADT,
-				sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt),
-				madt_proc, ARRAY_SIZE(madt_proc), MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			pr_err("Error parsing LAPIC/X2APIC entries\n");
-			return ret;
-		}
-
-		count = madt_proc[0].count;
-		x2count = madt_proc[1].count;
+		count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_APIC,
+					      acpi_parse_lapic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
+		if (count > 0)
+			has_lapic_cpus = true;
+		x2count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_LOCAL_X2APIC,
+						acpi_parse_x2apic, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
 	}
 	if (!count && !x2count) {
 		pr_err("No LAPIC entries present\n");