[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:37:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>, andi.shyti@...nel.org,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, rjui@...adcom.com,
sbranden@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com, aisheng.dong@....com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com, kblaiech@...dia.com,
asmaa@...dia.com, loic.poulain@...aro.org, rfoss@...nel.org,
ardb@...nel.org, gcherian@...vell.com
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Use dev_err_probe in probe
function
On 08/08/2023 03:29, Liao Chang wrote:
> Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function
> so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles
> -EPROBE_DEFER nicely.
>
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpi2c_imx_isr, 0,
> pdev->name, lpi2c_imx);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq);
>
I don't think this is needed:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230721094641.77189-1-frank.li@vivo.com/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists