[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:07:19 -0400
From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
markgross@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: yazen.ghannam@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
avadhut.naik@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd: Introduce AMD Address Translation
Library
On 8/8/2023 8:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On August 8, 2023 5:17:33 AM GMT+02:00, "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>> Given it's 'library code' to be used by a bunch of things and also want to be able to use a module, what about putting it in lib/? There's plenty of library code there as tristate.
>
> It is x86-specific so not in there. Also, it might be used by multiple things so you want it as a separate "translation" service which is called by other modules.
>
There are modules in arch/x86, so I guess that's not an issue (not sure
what I was thinking).
This code is AMD-specific, and there's vendor-specific code in arch/x86
already. So it may be fine to have this in arch/x86/ras.
But just because there's existing vendor-specific code in arch/x86
doesn't necessarily mean we should keep adding to it. So is this okay?
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists