lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:07:19 -0400
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        markgross@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     yazen.ghannam@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        avadhut.naik@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform/x86/amd: Introduce AMD Address Translation
 Library

On 8/8/2023 8:10 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On August 8, 2023 5:17:33 AM GMT+02:00, "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>> Given it's 'library code' to be used by a bunch of things and also want to be able to use a module, what about putting it in lib/?  There's plenty of library code there as tristate.
> 
> It is x86-specific so not in there. Also, it might be used by multiple things so you want it as a separate "translation" service which is called by other modules.
> 

There are modules in arch/x86, so I guess that's not an issue (not sure 
what I was thinking).

This code is AMD-specific, and there's vendor-specific code in arch/x86 
already. So it may be fine to have this in arch/x86/ras.

But just because there's existing vendor-specific code in arch/x86 
doesn't necessarily mean we should keep adding to it. So is this okay?

Thanks,
Yazen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ