linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: rpi-panel-attiny-regulator: Remove redundant of_match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 08 Aug 2023 14:41:21 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: rpi-panel-attiny-regulator: Remove
 redundant of_match_ptr()

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 21:41:27 +0800, Ruan Jinjie wrote:
> The driver depends on CONFIG_OF, so it is not necessary to use
> of_match_ptr() here, and __maybe_unused can also be removed.
> 
> Even for drivers that do not depend on CONFIG_OF, it's almost always
> better to leave out the of_match_ptr(), since the only thing it can
> possibly do is to save a few bytes of .text if a driver can be used both
> with and without it.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: rpi-panel-attiny-regulator: Remove redundant of_match_ptr()
      commit: 200ee464f7a9a4e8d7a51a2083b28cf240e7cb91

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark