[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 16:26:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>,
Kent Gustavsson <kent@...oris.se>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
Ramona Bolboaca <ramona.bolboaca@...log.com>,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: adc: mcp3911: add support for the whole
MCP39xx family
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 09:49:43AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/08/2023 09:22, Marcus Folkesson wrote:
...
> >>> + ret = device_property_read_u32(&adc->spi->dev, "microchip,device-addr", &adc->dev_addr);
> >>
> >> Why not spi->dev? Ditto for other uses like this.
> >
> > After all, I think it is better to stick sith adc->spi-dev to be
> > consistent with the rest of the probe function. Change to spi->dev
> > should probably be a seperate patch.
> > Do you agree?
> >
>
> You can first simplify the usages and then add new family support
> already using spi->dev.
He-he, answered the same :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists